• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us now  07 4688 2188

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Manifesto
    • Our Future
  • Careers
  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Manifesto
    • Our Future
  • Careers
  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals

$700 saved costs family $50,000

You are here: Home / News / $700 saved costs family $50,000

In a troubling example of the dangers of cutting costs in estate planning we’ve recently seen a case where not seeking professional advice has cost a family dearly. In this case a $30 will kit was used, instead of seeking legal advice that would have cost around $700, and the result will cost the family around $50,000 in legal fees arising from a disputed will.

This is a sad result where a mum who thought she was doing the right thing by her children has drafted a Will herself using a Will Kit with the end result being that none of her children will receive what she hoped from her estate.

How it unfolded

Mum was an elderly lady with 6 adult children.

After her husband died, she bought and completed a Will kit which made the following gifts:

  • Her house (worth approximately $400,000) for Son 1 to live in it rent free for life; and
  • Her cash at bank (just over $10,000) was to be divided between all of her children except Son 1 and Daughter 2.

The Will did not mention how the ongoing house costs such as rates and repairs were to be paid while Son 1 lived there rent free nor how sale proceeds were to be divided when the house was eventually sold.

Further, there was no provision made for the distribution of the rest of the estate such as household contents, cars or other personal assets.

Finally, there was no provision made for Daughter 2 at all.

Son 1 and Daughter 2 were appointed as the executors of the estate.

Unfortunately, Son 1 and Daughter 2 have had a difficult relationship for some time and are unable to agree how to deal with the deficient Will and at this stage have appointed two separate law firms to provide advice.

It is anticipated that at least one of the other children are likely to bring a claim for further provision from the estate.

It is estimated that even if the claim for further provision is made, and this claim settles out of court the legal fees for all 6 parties involved are likely to be in excess of $50,000 and will probably require the forced sale of the unit to pay out each child.

This could easily have been avoided.

If Mum had spoken to an experienced estate planning lawyer she would have received advice about the terms under which Son 1 could live in the house as well as advice about the need for a direction for the residue of the estate.
This may have meant her other children may not have considered bringing a claim against her estate as the shares in the house (or sale proceeds in the future) would be secure for each child.

This scenario yet again highlights the importance of seeking legal advice when preparing your estate planning documents.

This is a relatively small estate and with good advice a Will that ensured the testator’s wishes were followed could easily have been prepared but now the emotional and financial cost of having to administer a Will that failed to properly deal with Mum’s affairs is something this family will never forget.

Previous Post: « Dismissal because of domestic violence deemed not discrimination
Next Post: But the doctor told me so! »

Primary Sidebar

We can help

Sheelagh Gray

Section Head - Tax, Structures + Planning

Ben Gouldson

Director

Madeline Fouhy

Lawyer

Brittany Dunham

Paralegal

Related Alerts

April 14, 2021
Cash is King – Payment Times Reporting for Large Business (>$100 m) in Australia

The Federal Government has released the payment times reporting rules (Payment Times Reporting Rules...

April 13, 2021
Are you the attorney for a person eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine?

The COVID-19 vaccine rollout has commenced in Australia and while there is some debate...

Casual employment reform – what do you need to know?

On 26 March 2021, the rights and obligations of casual employees outlined in the...

View other alerts

Footer

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

CLIFFORD GOULDSON LAWYERS
P: 07 4688 2188
F: 07 4688 2199
[email protected]
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Locations

TOOWOOMBA
Level 1, 610 Ruthven Street
PO Box 8208, Toowoomba South Qld 4350

BRISBANE
Level 54, 111 Eagle Street
Brisbane Q 4000

SUNSHINE COAST
Level 1,
Regatta Corporate Building
2 Innovation Parkway Birtinya QLD

 

MELBOURNE
Suite 37, Level 23,
Tower Five, 727 Collins Street
Melbourne VIC 3008
(Visited Office - available by appointment only)

SYDNEY
Suite 69, Level 26
1 Bligh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
(Visited Office - available by appointment only)

Practice Areas

  • Tax, Structures + Planning
  • Workplace
  • Litigation + Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial + Property
  • Construction
  • Intellectual Property
  • Privacy & Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

Site Footer

CG Law (Trading) Pty Ltd ACN 143 426 028 t/a Clifford Gouldson Lawyers ABN 89 143 426 028 Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation..

Copyright © 2021 Clifford Gouldson Lawyers · Privacy & Disclaimer · Terms of Use · Marketing by John Gray Marketing · Site by Kingfisher