• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us now  07 4688 2188

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Manifesto
    • Our Future
  • Careers
  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Manifesto
    • Our Future
  • Careers
  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals

The Celeste Barber decision – time to check your objectives?

You are here: Home / News / The Celeste Barber decision – time to check your objectives?

This week’s Supreme Court decision in relation to the $51 million that Celeste Barber raised is a good reminder about the importance of objectives, for all trusts, non-profits and companies.

Comedian Celeste Barber raised $51 million via a Facebook appeal during the recent summer bushfire crisis.

The NSW Rural Fire Service and Brigades Donations Fund (RFS Fund) is a charitable trust which was publicly named by Celeste, and nominated via PayPal, as the recipient of the donations.

The appeal raised far more money than expected – in fact, the most funds raised in any appeal on Facebook to date. Given the funds raised, focus shifted to whether, once the appeal went viral on the Internet, all the donors (many millions of people Australia and world wide) intended, or understood, that their donation was to go to the RFS Fund and its relatively narrow objectives.

Given the pressure on the RFS Fund to distribute the funds more broadly (to other organisations, including those in other States), the trustees of the RFS Fund sought direction from the Supreme Court of New South Wales (which was heard last week) to advise them as to their options.

The decision was handed down yesterday, which examined both the objectives of the PayPal Giving Fund (which collects donations as a charitable trust) and the objectives of the RFS Fund. Ultimately, the Court has advised the trustees of the RFS Fund that they must apply the funds in accordance with its objectives (and not use them for any alternative purpose) and that they cannot distribute the funds to any other organisation. Accordingly, the RFS Fund must use the funds for equipment, training and support for New South Wales volunteer fire fighters.

The public statements of Celeste Barber and various donors (who might have made comments which indicated a belief that their money would be used in a different way than the objectives in the RFS Fund) were found by the Court not to bind the trustees in the way they are required to apply those funds.

While the decision is technically limited to trusts in New South Wales, it is still a useful reminder for companies, non-profits and trusts alike that objectives are not just a tokenistic introduction to a trust deed or constitution – legally, they set the path that the organisation’s activities are required to follow .

If you need advice as to whether this decision may affect you, your demands or your business, please don’t hesitate to contact our Commercial + Property Team.

Previous Post: « Casual employees and WorkPac Pty Ltd – not again!
Next Post: How secure are your goods on account? »

Primary Sidebar

We can help

Amanda Tolson

Director

Carly Brailak

Special Counsel

David Thiel

Associate

Madeline Fouhy

Lawyer

Simone Faunt

Lawyer

Michelle Seidel

Conveyancing Paralegal

Tracey Gust

Paralegal

Maddie Yarrow

Legal Secretary

Related Alerts

April 14, 2021
Cash is King – Payment Times Reporting for Large Business (>$100 m) in Australia

The Federal Government has released the payment times reporting rules (Payment Times Reporting Rules...

January 19, 2021
Court ruling sparks action against insurers for COVID-affected businesses

The outcome of a recent test case relating to business interruption insurance for COVID-19...

October 2, 2020
Qld Government Enacts Retail Shop Leases Changes

On 29 September 2020 the Queensland Government enacted changes to the Retail Shop Leases and...

View other alerts

Footer

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

CLIFFORD GOULDSON LAWYERS
P: 07 4688 2188
F: 07 4688 2199
[email protected]
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Locations

TOOWOOMBA
Level 1, 610 Ruthven Street
PO Box 8208, Toowoomba South Qld 4350

BRISBANE
Level 54, 111 Eagle Street
Brisbane Q 4000

SUNSHINE COAST
Level 1,
Regatta Corporate Building
2 Innovation Parkway Birtinya QLD

 

MELBOURNE
Suite 37, Level 23,
Tower Five, 727 Collins Street
Melbourne VIC 3008
(Visited Office - available by appointment only)

SYDNEY
Suite 69, Level 26
1 Bligh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
(Visited Office - available by appointment only)

Practice Areas

  • Tax, Structures + Planning
  • Workplace
  • Litigation + Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial + Property
  • Construction
  • Intellectual Property
  • Privacy & Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

Site Footer

CG Law (Trading) Pty Ltd ACN 143 426 028 t/a Clifford Gouldson Lawyers ABN 89 143 426 028 Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation..

Copyright © 2021 Clifford Gouldson Lawyers · Privacy & Disclaimer · Terms of Use · Marketing by John Gray Marketing · Site by Kingfisher