• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us now  07 4688 2188

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Future
    • Toowoomba
    • Brisbane
    • Sunshine Coast
    • What our clients say!
  • Careers
  • Supporting our Community
    • Bringing art to the business world
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Future
    • Toowoomba
    • Brisbane
    • Sunshine Coast
    • What our clients say!
  • Careers
  • Supporting our Community
    • Bringing art to the business world
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals

Queensland sees its first conviction under new industrial manslaughter laws

You are here: Home / News / Queensland sees its first conviction under new industrial manslaughter laws

On 11 June 2020, the State of Queensland recorded its first conviction under the new industrial manslaughter laws set out within the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) (WHS Act).

The convictions came about after a tragic incident where an employee of a Brisbane auto recycling company was crushed by a reversing forklift in May 2019, causing him to die in hospital 8 days later.

The company in this case pleaded guilty to the offence of industrial manslaughter and was fined $3 million dollars by the court.

The company’s directors were each charged with and pleaded guilty to the lesser offences of reckless conduct—category 1 under the WHS Act and were each sentenced to 10 months imprisonment, wholly suspended for 20 months. Importantly, the directors were not charged with industrial manslaughter.

An investigation into the incident revealed that (among other things) the company had no safety systems in place, particularly with regard to managing the interaction of forklifts and pedestrians and supervising the operators of forklifts. The driver responsible for the incident did not have the necessary license, nor did the company take any steps at all to assess the worker’s competency to operate the forklift.

Queensland District Court Judge Anthony Rafter noted that the gravity of the offending and the moral culpability of each defendant was high. The conduct of the company caused the death of the worker and the directors were reckless as to that risk.

In sentencing the defendants however, Judge Rafter was mindful of significant mitigating factors that had to be taken into account in each case.

While the directors of the company had initially engaged in conduct that deflected responsibility for the incident, they did eventually cooperate with investigators, entered early pleas of guilty and were clearly remorseful.

They were both relatively young men who had grown up in Afghanistan and had seen difficult times there. Based on the prospects of deportation and their good character, the directors received a far lighter sentence than the maximum penalty for a category 1 offence under the WHS Act, which is a maximum fine of $600,000 or 5 years imprisonment.

In respect of the company, Judge Rafter concluded that a fine of $3 million was appropriate, because a lesser penalty would not have adequately punished and/or served to deter others and because the company did not have the capacity to pay a fine anywhere near the maximum for the offence of industrial manslaughter, which is $10 million for a body corporate.

Under the WHS Act, a person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) has the primary duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers within the workplace and officers of the PCBU must exercise due diligence to ensure that this primary duty is met.

Had the directors adequately complied with their duties under the WHS Act in the first place, then it is possible that this unfortunate accident may never have occurred.

Cases such as these highlight the importance of ensuring that even the most basic and common sense work health and safety measures are in place within the workplace and that continual review of these measures is undertaken.

If you are unsure about whether there are faults in your safety systems at work, or if you feel that a review is sorely needed then we encourage you to contact our Workplace Team today.

Previous Post: « No App, No work, No Lunch: Enforcing a COVIDSafe App Download
Next Post: More legal changes for building industry »

Primary Sidebar

We can help

Danny Clifford

Director

Angela Pratt

Special Counsel

Monique Chow

Lawyer

Melanie Sharpe

Lawyer

Michelle Price

Paralegal & Legal Secretary

Related Alerts

April 7, 2025
Breaking Free: Non-compete clauses may be banned for nearly 3 million Aussies

In the recently announced 2025 Federal Budget, the Albanese Government has stated that if...

January 15, 2025
New Criminal Penalty for Wage Theft: What Employers Need to Know

As of 1 January 2025, intentional wage theft—intentionally failing to pay employees their full...

August 21, 2024
Are You Ready? Fair Work Act amendments start 26 August

The second part of the Federal Government’s “Closing Loopholes” reforms passed Parliament on 12...

View other alerts

Footer

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

CLIFFORD GOULDSON LAWYERS
P: 07 4688 2188
F: 07 4688 2199
mail@cglaw.com.au
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Locations

TOOWOOMBA (Head Office)
259 Ruthven Street,
Toowoomba Q 4350

PO Box 8208,
Toowoomba South Q 4350

Toowoomba Office

BRISBANE
Level 5, 231 George Street,
Brisbane Q 4000

PO Box 12802 George Street,
Brisbane Q 4003

Brisbane Office

 

SUNSHINE COAST
Regatta Corporate Building, Office 3,
Ground Floor, Innovation Parkway,
Birtinya Q 4575

Locked Bag 5010
Caloundra DC Q 4551

Sunshine Coast Office

Practice Areas

  • Property + Business Transactions
  • Workplace
  • Litigation + Dispute Resolution
  • Intellectual Property + Technology
  • Wills, Estates, Planning + Structuring
  • Business + Corporate Advisory
  • Construction
  • Privacy & Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

Site Footer

CG Law (Trading) Pty Ltd ACN 143 426 028 t/a Clifford Gouldson Lawyers ABN 89 143 426 028 Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

The contents of this website are provided solely for general information purposes and do not constitute legal or other professional advice. Clifford Gouldson Lawyers expressly disclaims any liability arising from the use or reliance on the information provided. If you require legal or other expert advice or assistance, then you should seek our help or the services of a qualified professional.

Copyright © 2025 Clifford Gouldson Lawyers · Privacy & Disclaimer · Terms of Use · Marketing by John Gray Marketing · Site by Kingfisher