• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us now  07 4688 2188

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Future
    • Toowoomba
    • Brisbane
    • Sunshine Coast
    • What our clients say!
  • Careers
  • Supporting our Community
    • Bringing art to the business world
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • About
    • Our Origin Story
    • Our Future
    • Toowoomba
    • Brisbane
    • Sunshine Coast
    • What our clients say!
  • Careers
  • Supporting our Community
    • Bringing art to the business world
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Knowledge
  • Events
  • Industries
  • For Individuals

Fair Work Delivers a Key Decision for a Vaccine Mandate in a Workplace

You are here: Home / News / Fair Work Delivers a Key Decision for a Vaccine Mandate in a Workplace

A recent decision delivered by the Fair Work Commission has confirmed a South Australian shipbuilding yard can dismiss employees for failing to comply with the company’s vaccination requirements. 

The Australian Submarine Corporation (ASC) introduced a COVID-19 Policy which required employees and contractors be double vaccinated against COVID-19 before entering the worksite at Osborne, South Australia.

On 3 June 2022, the Commission concluded that the ASC Policy which included mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations for its workers was lawful and reasonable[1].

The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) and Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) took the Australian Submarine Corporation (ASC) to the Fair Work Commission, arguing the mandate was illegal because it was an unlawful and unreasonable request for the submarine workers to be mandatory vaccinated to work.

The unions submitted that the mandate was not “a reasonably proportionate response to current risks created by COVID-19”. They also asserted that ASC failed to adequately consult its workers about the policy.

The ASC presented their consultation plan and argued that their vaccination policy was logical, fair and balanced as it allowed unvaccinated staff at its Osborne facility to provide a medical exemption. The ASC stated that unvaccinated workers could create risks to its client, the Royal Australian Navy, which required its crew to be double-vaccinated. The company submitted to the commission that its mandate was reasonable following the opening of state borders and the current risk of transmission in workplaces.

The Decision

The key elements of the decision by the Commission focussed on determining the following two questions:

  1. Had ASC met the consultation requirements prescribed by their ASC Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement) in respect of its COVID-19 Vaccination Policy?; and
  2. Would an instruction from ASC that employees covered by the Agreement comply with the COVID-19 Vaccination Policy be a reasonable and lawful instruction?

DP Anderson said that the steps taken by ASC between 23 November 2021 and 28 March 2022 met its consultation obligations under the Agreement. ASC had a predisposed view in favour of the decision it had made but was willing to, and did consider views which questioned the need for the vaccination mandate. It did so in the context of also receiving views on the other elements of the Policy which included conditions and timing. The Commission’s decision stated that:

ASC was managing health risks in a pandemic. This required leadership not just from governments but from the corporate sector meeting its obligations to proactively manage workplace risk.

Lessons for employers

The key takeaway for employers from this decision is that when faced with implementing a COVID-19 Vaccination Policy in the workplace, the Employer needs to ensure they follow a proper process for engaging with and consulting workers and other key stakeholders.

Employers in particular have to consider their consultation process in their workplace regarding the making of lawful and reasonable decisions that will affect their team.

During the consultation process, the employer should carefully consider any issues raised by workers and stakeholders.

The legal issues can be quite different depending on the source of the requirement to be vaccinated. This can relate to a public health order, issues of consultation, privacy considerations and other reasonableness of the requirement to be vaccinated that may apply.

Our Workplace Team can assist if you need advice in relation to the adequacy of the consultation process and the implementation of workplace policies for your business.


[1] Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU);and Australian Workers’ Union v ASC Pty Ltd T/A Australian Submarine Corporation [2022] FWC 1198.


For further information please contact Danny Clifford, Director.

The assistance of Nicole Ferraro, Law Graduate in researching this article is gratefully acknowledged.

Previous Post: « Water Rights: A Quick Overview
Next Post: Marcia Marcia Marcia – blended families and estate planning challenges  »

Primary Sidebar

We can help

Danny Clifford

Director

Angela Pratt

Special Counsel

Monique Chow

Lawyer

Melanie Sharpe

Lawyer

Michelle Price

Paralegal & Legal Secretary

Related Alerts

April 7, 2025
Breaking Free: Non-compete clauses may be banned for nearly 3 million Aussies

In the recently announced 2025 Federal Budget, the Albanese Government has stated that if...

January 15, 2025
New Criminal Penalty for Wage Theft: What Employers Need to Know

As of 1 January 2025, intentional wage theft—intentionally failing to pay employees their full...

August 21, 2024
Are You Ready? Fair Work Act amendments start 26 August

The second part of the Federal Government’s “Closing Loopholes” reforms passed Parliament on 12...

View other alerts

Footer

Clifford Gouldson Lawyers

CLIFFORD GOULDSON LAWYERS
P: 07 4688 2188
F: 07 4688 2199
mail@cglaw.com.au
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Locations

TOOWOOMBA (Head Office)
259 Ruthven Street,
Toowoomba Q 4350

PO Box 8208,
Toowoomba South Q 4350

Toowoomba Office

BRISBANE
Level 5, 231 George Street,
Brisbane Q 4000

PO Box 12802 George Street,
Brisbane Q 4003

Brisbane Office

 

SUNSHINE COAST
Regatta Corporate Building, Office 3,
Ground Floor, Innovation Parkway,
Birtinya Q 4575

Locked Bag 5010
Caloundra DC Q 4551

Sunshine Coast Office

Practice Areas

  • Property + Business Transactions
  • Workplace
  • Litigation + Dispute Resolution
  • Intellectual Property + Technology
  • Wills, Estates, Planning + Structuring
  • Business + Corporate Advisory
  • Construction
  • Privacy & Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

Site Footer

CG Law (Trading) Pty Ltd ACN 143 426 028 t/a Clifford Gouldson Lawyers ABN 89 143 426 028 Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

The contents of this website are provided solely for general information purposes and do not constitute legal or other professional advice. Clifford Gouldson Lawyers expressly disclaims any liability arising from the use or reliance on the information provided. If you require legal or other expert advice or assistance, then you should seek our help or the services of a qualified professional.

Copyright © 2025 Clifford Gouldson Lawyers · Privacy & Disclaimer · Terms of Use · Marketing by John Gray Marketing · Site by Kingfisher